{{in the early morning}} March 27th, 2005 › SK2 - Referrer Check False Positives

When I first installed SK2 I was getting a large number of false positives from the RBL and Trackback referrer plugins. At the time I tracked it down to weird DNS issues and disabled them as I was at work and didn’t have time to look into it.

Since then I have investigated, discovered and fixed the problem.

Symptoms:

  • All the SK2 plugins that use DNS in one form or another give positive karma to comments / trackbacks that are spam.
  • When you look at the karma report the IP address returned by the RBL looks familiar - Its the IP address of your web server!
  • Trackback checks find links to your site in the referrer but a manual check finds that the site doesn’t exist

Looking at what was going on, I was a tad confused - it seemed that the dns server was returning the local ip address if it couldn’t get a result - very strange - to start with I thought that maybe the dns proxy I was using was screwed so I disabled that but the problem still existed. Dragging out my favourite network analyser, tethereal, I watched what was going on when the dns lookups occurred and noticed the following:

  1. The first dns request looked ok and got a failed response.
  2. The second dns request had the localdomain name tacked on the end and got an successful response.

This got me thinking and I went and looked at the dns setup at my host - looking through the zone file I found and interesting entry that I didn’t remember adding:

* IN A 217.155.152.65

This catch-all dns entry meant that any lookup under ftwr.co.uk was going to resolve to the web servers IP address!

There are a number of ways to fix this issue, which in order of preference are:

  1. Fix the code so that all dns lookups are specified with a “.” on the end, this means that the resolving library will not try adding the local domain on the end (I believe so anyway).
  2. Remove the catch-all entry from your dns - whether or not you want to do this or not depends on why its there in the first place and whether you have control over it.
Read 3 Comments

3 Comments »

Yes, I know I have a catchall. As I tend to add/remove vhosts pretty often, it allows me to do so without messing with the DNS records.

I’m in favour of solution #1 :-)

Comment by Steph — 27/3/2005 @ 9:17 am §

 

Solution #1 is the one I’d go for too!
#2 is a useful stopgap if you can’t/don’t know how to fix the code though! :P

Comment by westi — 29/3/2005 @ 8:35 am §

 

Just thought I’d mention for future archiving reference: Solution #1 was adopted and the code, as of 2.0b1, works fine now.

Cheers Peter for finding the problem…

Comment by dr Dave — 10/5/2005 @ 7:49 am §

 

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

17 queries. 0.759 seconds. Powered by WordPress.