http://blog.ftwr.co.uk/archives/2005/08/21/optimising-feed-reading-redux/ Random commentary... Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:27:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 http://blog.ftwr.co.uk/archives/2005/08/21/optimising-feed-reading-redux/#comment-4494 westi Thu, 29 Sep 2005 15:07:34 +0000 #comment-4494 I agree skippy FeedOnFeeds is still working well for me and coped nicely when I recently returned from holiday to 700+ unread items. I have a local Gregarius svn install that I was going to do a review of but haven't got round to yet. It does seem to look nicer but I have a few quibbles with the number of clicks it takes to achieve some tasks - like marking as read for example. Maybe I'll write that review up soon ;-) I agree skippy FeedOnFeeds is still working well for me and coped nicely when I recently returned from holiday to 700+ unread items. I have a local Gregarius svn install that I was going to do a review of but haven’t got round to yet. It does seem to look nicer but I have a few quibbles with the number of clicks it takes to achieve some tasks - like marking as read for example. Maybe I’ll write that review up soon

]]> http://blog.ftwr.co.uk/archives/2005/08/21/optimising-feed-reading-redux/#comment-4493 skippy Thu, 29 Sep 2005 15:00:08 +0000 #comment-4493 I've been using FeedOnFeeds for quite some time now, and I quite like it. You're right, it's not particularly pretty, but it doesn't get in my way, either! I recently tried <a href="http://gregarius.net/" rel="nofollow">Gregarius</a>, and was mostly disappointed. It looks promising, but is not yet functional enough to replace FoF for me. I’ve been using FeedOnFeeds for quite some time now, and I quite like it. You’re right, it’s not particularly pretty, but it doesn’t get in my way, either! I recently tried Gregarius, and was mostly disappointed. It looks promising, but is not yet functional enough to replace FoF for me.

]]>